© janaka dharmasena dreamstime.com Application Notes | December 02, 2020
All That Glitters Is Not Gold!
Application engineers often repeatedly answer the same questions from different customers, especially queries related to the selection of parts in their application. One mistake we see in part selection happening time and time again is that the customers become over enamored by what I like to call “the sheet” in data sheets.
I’m talking about the shiny, glittery, sexy specs. “Wow! That ADC has a high SNR!” This is the story of one such customer who was impressed with one ADC’s high SNR but who forgot to consider other important data sheet specs. We will also address common mistakes and how to choose the right parts for your application. I recently received a customer’s case where he wanted a suitable ADC for his seismic- and vibration-related application. He knew he needed an ADC with a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and good total harmonic distortion (THD) for his application and concluded that any SNR above 110 dB is fine. Since vibration sensors output continuously varying ac voltage signal overlapped on a dc voltage signal, we need a very high performance, high resolution ADC that has a high SNR to properly obtain a digitalized version without being affected much by the noise in the vibration-related applications. Figure 1. Front page of one of ADI’s precision ADC data sheets for the AD7768/AD7768-4. What customers generally do while choosing parts is that they shortlist them by performing a parametric search of their requirements in third-party websites and just check the front page of each product with their catchy product descriptions and fall for the first page of the data sheet, which describes the product’s highlights. Often, data sheets are much more complex and require further investigation beyond the front page highlights. This customer also saw the front page of one the ADI’s precision converter ADCs, AD7768, and found its SNR to be just 108 dB (dynamic range and SNR both are a mirror for rms noise and can be treated almost the same as they are proportional). The customer’s reaction was, “Oh! This ADC is definitely not suitable for my application. It has just 108 dB SNR!” On scrolling further down, he found another table, shown in Figure 2, where the SNR for two different filters was shown. Figure 2. Specifications table of the AD7768/AD778-4. He concluded, “Okay ... I can get 111 dB by using a sinc5 filter. But I recently saw another product from another company that has an SNR greater than 115 dB, I should go with the latter.” Hold on! There’s a mistake in this comparison. There is a trade-off between the output data rate (ODR) that determines the speed of operation of the ADC and the SNR that determines the resolution and just how noise free the output is.1 The higher the ODR, the lesser the SNR, and vice versa. Therefore, each ODR corresponds to a single SNR value. It is important to first identify the output rate needed and then compare ADCs based on the corresponding SNR values. Figure 3. Output data rate vs. rms noise. This customer had compared one device with 108 dB SNR at 256 kSPS with another that had an SNR of more than 115 dB at just 1 kSPS ODR. Thus, based on front page data, it appeared that one product had a lesser SNR than the other, and that the latter was better for the application. However, this was not an accurate way to compare the data. From Figure 3, we can see that with the increase in the ODR, the rms noise also increases and corrupts the digital value, which in turn reduces its SNR. Figure 4 shows a screenshot from the AD7768 data sheet, where we can see SNRs of 123.88 dB and 126.89 dB at 1 kSPS ODR for wideband and sinc5 filters, respectively, which is much higher than that of the competing device at this ODR. Figure 4. Noise performance vs. ODR of the AD7768/AD7768-4. The following points must be kept in mind before choosing a part: It is important to choose the relevant specs suitable to the operating conditions. Before concluding which part is suitable, it is essential to compare VREF, VDD, power consumption, mode of operation, thermal range of operation, and a few other specs. The SNR value itself depends on all of those parameters, which must be decided based on an application’s requirements—and the SNR value must be chosen by more than just the first page of the data sheet. Figure 5 shows how the rms noise values—and thus the SNR values—for the AD7768 are different for different VREF voltages and at different temperatures (rms noise is inversely related to SNR). Similar variations can be seen for the other parameters as well. Figure 5. (a) RMS noise vs. temperature, (b) RMS noise per channel for various VREF values. The relevent values at all VREFS, ODRs, etc. will not be given in the data sheet, which means we will have to extrapolate the data from the given information to get our required values. Be careful while choosing parts. The typical values are different from the minimum and maximum values. While typical values can be expected most of the time, the full range of values must be considered if an application is sensitive to the minimum and maximum values of a given parameter. Here is another example of a common, but avoidable, misinterpretation. Figure 6 (a) and Figure 6 (b) show the first page of the data sheets for the LTC6268 and ADA4530-1, respectively. When customers need an amplifier as the next stage after adding a very high impedance source, they primarily look for an amplifier with very low input bias current. Ideally, no current flows into the input terminals of an op amp. In practice, there are always two currents, IB+ and IB–, flowing into the input terminals of the op amp. These are called input bias current. For a high impedance source, amplifiers with less input bias current are chosen to avoid the voltage drop at its input stage. LTC6268 and ADA4530-1 are marketed with the titles “Ultralow Bias Current FET Input Op Amp” and “Femtoampere Input Bias Current.” A cursory glance at the first page of their data sheets, as shown in Figure 6, shows that the LTC6268 has 3 fA whereas ADA4530-1 has 20 fA at room temperature, which may lead customers to believe that the former is more suitable for their low input bias current requirement. Being that data sheets vary, the typical bias current is not listed on the first page of the ADA4530-1 data sheet as it is on the LTC6260’s first page. Instead the maximum bias current is listed on the first page. To highlight again, typical values are different from the minimum and maximum values! If the application is very sensitive to those values, we should consider the worst-case minimum and maximum values rather than the typical values. Figure 6. (a) Front page of the LTC6268 data sheet, (b) front page of the ADA4530-1 data sheet. Figure 7 shows the specifications of LTC6268 and ADA4530-1. We can see that although the maximum input bias current rating for both the parts are the same (±20 fA), the typical value for ADA4530-1 is less than 1 fA, which is much better than the 3 fA bias current of LTC6268. But this number is not highlighted in the first page of ADA4530-1 data sheet. Hence, a more in-depth reading of the data sheets is needed. Although ADA4530-1 is better in terms of typical input bias current, these devices may vary with other features and this feature alone is insufficient to determine which part is better. Figure 7. (a) Specifications of the LTC6268, (b) specifications of the ADA4530-1. As a concluding note, I would like to emphasize the fact that it is important to first decide the operating conditions of an application and then look for specifications corresponding to its purpose. Sometimes the front page of the data sheet or its title might highlight features at some other specification and operating condition, in which case we must be prudent in choosing the suitable one for our need by careful perusal of the data sheet. We should also decide our power budget for our product before choosing a device, because it is always possible to have the best features and good specs, but at a high cost and with a high power budget. References 1 “Chapter 20: Analog-to-Digital Conversion.” Analog Devices, Inc., September 2013. About the Author Tejaswini Anand is a product applications engineer in the Centralized Applications Center (CAC) team at © Analog Devices. She is interested in systems design and studying the large spectrum of ADI’s product portfolios and their applications and features. Tejaswini graduated from R.V. College of Engineering, Bangalore, India in 2019 as an electronics and communication engineer. During her term she partook in various national-level robotics competitions and hackathons and won a few. She can be reached at email@example.com.
InnovationLab acquires flexible printed battery technology from Evonik German printed electronics specialist, InnovationLab, has acquired the TAeTTOOz printable battery technology from Evonik.
Motorola secures chip supply with GlobalFoundries deal The US semiconductor foundry has entered into a long-term agreement to safeguard the supply of chip solutions for Motorola Solutions' radios, which are widely used by public safety, critical infrastructure and enterprise organisations.
Foxconn and Yageo JV invests in Taiwan MOSFET manufacturer Hon Hai Technology Group (more commonly know as Foxconn) and Yageo Group have – via their joint venture XSemi – invested NTD 2.89 billion (EUR 91.6 million) in Taiwanese MOSFET manufacturer Advanced Power Electronics Corp.
Nexperia and Kyocera to develop GaN automotive power modules Nexperia and Kyocera AVX Components (Salzburg) GmbH, have entered into a partnership with a focus on power components – the companies aims to jointly developing GaN applications for electric vehicles.
Intel invests $700 million in new Oregon mega lab The US chipmaker plans to invest more than USD 700 million for a 200,000 square-foot, research and development mega lab focused on data center technologies and addressing areas such as heating, cooling and water usage.
Sponsored content by FusionManufacturers Reassess their Supply Chains Prevailing obstacles since the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020 have manufacturers reassessing their supply chain strategies. The following major disruptions that occurred entering 2022 added to existing setbacks, or created new ones altogether:
Obsolescence management cannot be an afterthought “Obsolescence has always existed. However, it usually only becomes really critical for companies when the exception mutates into the norm. And in recent years we have unfortunately experienced this unwanted development not only with semiconductor chips, but increasingly with many other components, materials and raw materials,” says IIOM President and COGD Chairman Dr Wolfgang Heinbach.
Tower record 1Q22 revenues of $421 Million, a 21% YoY Tower Semiconductor reported first quarter 2022 revenue of USD 421 million, an increase of 21% compared to USD 347 million in the first quarter of 2021.
Gallium Semiconductor opens its Nijmegen R&D center Gallium Semiconductor has officially held the grand opening of its European R&D center in a ceremony in Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Ferrotec to add manufacturing capacity with new plant in Malaysia Ferrotec, a global supplier of materials, components, and precision system solutions, is establishing a new manufacturing facility at Kulim Hi-Tech Park, Kedah, facilitated by the Malaysian Investment Development Authority (MIDA).
Skeleton targets the Polish market – teams up with ZPUE Supercapacitor specialist, Skeleton Technologies, and ZPUE, a Polish manufacturer of electrical devices for electrical power distribution utilities, have entered into a commercial agreement to provide energy storage solutions to the Polish market.
Texas Instruments breaks ground $30 billion investment The semiconductor manufacturer has broken ground on its new 300mm semiconductor wafer fabrication plants in Sherman, Texas – an investment set to create as many as create as many as 3,000 jobs.
ERP partners with Flip to fulfill EOL and Obsolete component solutions Flip Electronics has signed a franchised distributor partnership agreement with ERP Power (ERP) to distribute its End-of Life (EOL) semiconductor products.
Foxconn and DNeX build and operate wafer fab in Malaysia Dagang NeXchange Berhad (DNeX) and Foxconn subsidiary Big Innovation Holdings (BIH), plan to set up a joint venture company to build and operate a new 300mm wafer fab in Malaysia.
Sponsored content by Proval ServiceSince 25 years your partner for SMT stencils and solder pallets. 25 years of experience makes Proval Service not just a supplier but your trustful and grounded partner to support you with SMT stencils and solder pallets. A qualified and unite team can satisfy every customer's need during the whole process.
Imec and semiconductor partners target greener chip manufacturing Nanoelectronics research and innovation center, imec, says that it has managed to pool together stakeholders from the semiconductor value chain – from companies such as Apple and Microsoft, to suppliers, including ASM, Kurita, SCREEN and Tokyo Electron – to participate in its Sustainable Semiconductor Technologies and Systems (SSTS) research program.
SiPearl reaches milestone – 100 employees The European chip designer has exceeded 100 employees across its six sites in France (Maisons-Laffitte, Grenoble, Massy, Sophia Antipolis), Germany (Duisburg) and Spain (Barcelona).
Renesas to convert closed factory to 300mm wafer fab Renesas plans to conduct a JPY 90 billion (EUR 664 million) investment in its Kofu factory, located in Kai City, Yamanashi Prefecture, Japan. The company closed the factory back in October 2014, but now intends to reopen the fab in 2024 as a 300mm wafer fab.
Arrow names Jörg Strughold as president EMEA components Arrow Electronics announces that Jörg Strughold will take over as president of its components business in EMEA. He succeeds Martin Bielesch who has decided to leave the company.
€14 billion to attract semiconductor players to Germany EUR 14 billion in state support is the German governments new strategy to attract more chipmakers to the country.
10 different companies have expressed interest in Toshiba Back in April 2022, Toshiba Corporation announced that it had resolved to solicit proposals on strategic alternatives from potential investors and sponsors. The Japanese company is seeking to enhance its corporate value and has since the announcement been holding discussions with the potential partners.
TDK expands with new MLCC production site in Japan Japanese TDK Corporation says that it will construct a new production building on the premises of the Kitakami Factory – located in Kitakami city, Iwate prefecture, Japan – in order to to enhance the company's MLCC production.
Avnet breaks ground on German expansion In order to better serve its customers’ local and global needs, Avnet is expanding in two locations in Germany. Avnet Embedded broke ground on a new manufacturing site in Eschbach and Avnet EMEA plans to build its third European logistics centre in Bernburg.
Viettel & Qualcomm team up on 5G infrastructure development Viettel Group and Qualcomm Technologies plans to collaborate and develop a next-generation 5G Radio Unit (RU) with massive MIMO capabilities and distributed units (DUs). This focuses on helping to expedite the development and roll-out of 5G network infrastructure and services in Vietnam and globally.
Applied Materials opens Montana expansion – create 200 new jobs The company has opened its latest expansion in Montana, a new semiconductor manufacturing center set to create 200 jobs in the Flathead Valley.
How to easily select the right frequency generation component Question: What is the right frequency generation component for my application?
Bell Semiconductor is suing companies left and right In late April, Bell Semiconductor, a Pennsylvania-based technology and intellectual property licensing company, filed lawsuits against Micron, Infineon, Nvidia and seven other companies alleging infringement of one of its patents.Load more news