© aydindurdu dreamstime.com
Application Notes | February 06, 2017

A Noisy Noise Annoys

But there is more to designing low noise circuits than choosing the lowest voltage noise density (en) amplifier for a given frequency band. As shown in Figure 2, other noise sources come into play, with incoherent sources combining as a root sum of squares.

Figure 2: Op Amp Circuit Noise Sources

First, consider resistors as noise sources. Resistors inherently have noise, proportional to the square root of the resistance value. At a temperature of 300K, the voltage noise density of any resistor is en = 0.13√R nV/√Hz. This noise can also be considered as a Norton equivalent current noise: in = en/R = 0.13/√R nA/√Hz. Resistors therefore have a noise power of 17 zeptoWatts. Good op amps will have lower noise power than this. For example, the LT6018 noise power (measured at 1KHz) is about 1 zeptoWatt.

In the op amp circuit of Figure 2, the source resistance, gain resistor, and feedback resistor (RS, R1, and R2 respectively) all contribute to the circuit noise. When calculating noise, the “per root Hertz” used in voltage noise density can be confusing. But noise power is what adds together, not noise voltage. So to calculate the integrated voltage noise of a resistor or op amp, multiply the voltage noise density by the square root of the number of Hertz in the frequency band. For example, a 100Ω resistor has 1.3μV RMS noise over a 1MHz bandwidth (0.13nV/√Ω * √100Ω * √1,000,000Hz). For a circuit with a first order rather than brick wall filter, the bandwidth would be multiplied by 1.57 to capture the noise in the higher bandwidth skirt. To express the noise as peak-to-peak rather than RMS, multiply by a factor of 6 (not 2.8, as you would for a sinusoid). With these considerations, the noise of this 100Ω resistor with a simple 1MHz low-pass filter is closer to 9.8μVP-P.

Also, the op amp has input current noise associated with the current into or out of each input, in- and in+. These multiply by the resistances they work into, R1 in parallel with R2 in the case of in- and RS in the case of in+ to create voltage noise through the magic of Ohm’s law. Looking inside the amplifier (Figure 3), this current noise is comprised of multiple sources.

Figure 3: Coherent and Incoherent Noise Sources in an Op Amp Diff Pair

Considering the wideband noise, each of the two input transistors have shot noise associated with their base, ini- and ini+, which are not coherent. The noise from the current source in the input pair tail, int also creates coherent noise split between the two inputs (int/2β in each). If the resistance seen by the two inputs is equal, the coherent voltage noise at each input is also equal and cancels according to the amplifier’s common mode rejection capability, leaving primarily the incoherent noise. This is listed as the balanced current noise in data sheets. If the resistance seen at the two inputs is greatly mismatched, then the coherent and incoherent noise components remain and the voltage noise adds as the root sum of squares. This is listed in some data sheets as unbalanced noise current.

Both the LT1028 and LT6018 have lower voltage noise than a 100Ω resistor (which at room temperature is 1.3nV/√Hz), so where source resistances are higher, the op amp’s voltage noise will often not be the limiting factor for noise in the circuit. In cases where the source resistances are much lower, the amplifier’s voltage noise will begin to dominate. For very high source resistances, the amplifier’s current noise dominates, and in the middle the Johnson noise of the resistors dominates (for well designed op amps which do not have excessively high noise power). The resistance at which the amplifier current noise and voltage noise are balanced so that neither dominates is equal to the amplifier’s voltage noise divided by its current noise. Since voltage and current noise vary with frequency so too does this midpoint resistance. For an unbalanced source, at 10Hz the midpoint of LT6018 is approximately 86Ω; at 10kHz it is about 320Ω.

Minimizing Circuit Noise

So what is the design engineer to do to minimize noise? For processing voltage signals, reducing the equivalent resistance below the amplifier’s midpoint resistance is a good place to start. For many applications the source resistance is fixed by the preceding stage, often a sensor. The gain and feedback resistors can be chosen to be small. However since the feedback resistor forms part of the op amp load, there are limits due to the amplifier’s output drive capability and the acceptable amount of heat and power dissipation. In addition to the resistance seen by the inputs, the frequency should also be considered. The total noise consists of the noise density integrated over the entire frequency. Filtering noise at frequencies higher (and perhaps also lower) than the signal bandwidth is important.

In transimpedance applications, where the input to the amplifier is a current, a different strategy is needed. In this case, the Johnson noise of the feedback resistor increases as a square root factor of its resistance value, but at the same time the signal gain increase is linear with the resistance value. Hence the best SNR is achieved with as large a resistance as the voltage capability or the current noise of the op amp allows. For an interesting example, see the back page application on page 26 of the LTC6090 data sheet.

Noise and Other Headaches

Noise is just one source of error, and should be considered within the context of other error sources. Input offset voltage (the voltage mismatch at the op amp inputs) can be thought of as DC noise. Its impact can be reduced significantly by doing a one-time system calibration, but this offset voltage changes with temperature and time as a result of changes in mechanical stress. It also changes with input level (CMRR) and power supply (PSRR). Real-time system calibration to cancel drift caused by these variables quickly becomes expensive and impractical. For harsh environment applications where the temperature fluctuates considerably, measurement uncertainty due to offset voltage and drift can dominate over noise. For example, an op amp with 5μV/°C temperature drift can experience an input-referred shift of 625μV from -40°C to 85°C due to temperature drift alone.

Compared with this, a few hundred nanovolts of noise is inconsequential. The LT6018 has outstanding drift performance of 0.5μV/°C and a maximum offset spec of 80μV from -40°C to 85°C. For even better performance, the recently released LTC2057 auto-zero amplifier has a maximum offset voltage of less than 7μV from -40°C to 125°C. Its wideband noise of 11nV/√Hz, and its DC to 10Hz noise is 200nVP-P. While this is higher noise than the LT6018, the LTC2057 can sometimes be the better choice for low frequency applications due to its outstanding input offset drift over temperature. It is also worth noting that due to its low input bias current, the LT2057 has much lower current noise than the LT6018. Another benefit of the LTC2057 low input bias current is that it has very low clock feedthrough compared with many other zero-drift amplifiers. Some of these other zero-drift amplifiers can exhibit large voltage noise spurs when source impedance is high.

In such high precision circuits, care must also be taken to minimize thermocouple effects, which occur anywhere that there is a junction of dissimilar metals. Even junctions of two copper wires from different manufacturers can generate thermal EMFs of 200nV/°C, over 13 times the worst-case drift of the LTC2057. Layout techniques to match or minimize the number of junctions in the amplifier’s input signal path, keep inputs and matching junctions close together, and avoiding thermal gradients are important in these low drift circuits.

Conclusion

Noise is a fundamental physical limitation. To minimize its effects in processing sensor signals, care must be taken in choosing a suitable op amp, in minimizing and matching input resistances, and in the physical layout of the design.

-----

Author: By Brian Black, Product Marketing Manager, Signal Conditioning Products and Glen Brisebois, Senior Applications Engineer, Signal Conditioning Products, © Linear Technology

## Designing with Op Amps for low noise

The realities of physics prevent us from attaining the ideal op amp with perfect precision, zero noise, infinite open-loop gain, slew rate, and gain-bandwidth product. But we expect successive generations of amplifiers to be better than the previous. What then to make of low 1/f noise op amps?

This is a product release announcement by Linear Technology Corporation. The issuer is solely responsible for its content.

Figure 1: LT1028 and LT6018 Integrated Voltage NoiseBack in 1985, George Erdi of Linear Technology designed the LT1028. For over 30 years, it has remained the lowest voltage noise op amp available at low frequency with 0.85nV/√Hz input voltage noise density at 1kHz and 35nVP-P 0.1Hz to 10Hz input voltage noise. It wasn’t until this year that a new amplifier, the LT6018 challenged the LT1028’s position with 0.1Hz to 10Hz input voltage noise of 30nVP-P and a 1Hz 1/f corner frequency, although it’s wideband frequency is 1.2nV/√Hz. The result is that the LT6018 is the lower noise choice for lower frequency applications, while the LT1028 provides better performance for many wideband applications, as shown in Figure 1.

A Noisy Noise Annoys

But there is more to designing low noise circuits than choosing the lowest voltage noise density (en) amplifier for a given frequency band. As shown in Figure 2, other noise sources come into play, with incoherent sources combining as a root sum of squares.

Figure 2: Op Amp Circuit Noise Sources

First, consider resistors as noise sources. Resistors inherently have noise, proportional to the square root of the resistance value. At a temperature of 300K, the voltage noise density of any resistor is en = 0.13√R nV/√Hz. This noise can also be considered as a Norton equivalent current noise: in = en/R = 0.13/√R nA/√Hz. Resistors therefore have a noise power of 17 zeptoWatts. Good op amps will have lower noise power than this. For example, the LT6018 noise power (measured at 1KHz) is about 1 zeptoWatt.

In the op amp circuit of Figure 2, the source resistance, gain resistor, and feedback resistor (RS, R1, and R2 respectively) all contribute to the circuit noise. When calculating noise, the “per root Hertz” used in voltage noise density can be confusing. But noise power is what adds together, not noise voltage. So to calculate the integrated voltage noise of a resistor or op amp, multiply the voltage noise density by the square root of the number of Hertz in the frequency band. For example, a 100Ω resistor has 1.3μV RMS noise over a 1MHz bandwidth (0.13nV/√Ω * √100Ω * √1,000,000Hz). For a circuit with a first order rather than brick wall filter, the bandwidth would be multiplied by 1.57 to capture the noise in the higher bandwidth skirt. To express the noise as peak-to-peak rather than RMS, multiply by a factor of 6 (not 2.8, as you would for a sinusoid). With these considerations, the noise of this 100Ω resistor with a simple 1MHz low-pass filter is closer to 9.8μVP-P.

Also, the op amp has input current noise associated with the current into or out of each input, in- and in+. These multiply by the resistances they work into, R1 in parallel with R2 in the case of in- and RS in the case of in+ to create voltage noise through the magic of Ohm’s law. Looking inside the amplifier (Figure 3), this current noise is comprised of multiple sources.

Figure 3: Coherent and Incoherent Noise Sources in an Op Amp Diff Pair

Considering the wideband noise, each of the two input transistors have shot noise associated with their base, ini- and ini+, which are not coherent. The noise from the current source in the input pair tail, int also creates coherent noise split between the two inputs (int/2β in each). If the resistance seen by the two inputs is equal, the coherent voltage noise at each input is also equal and cancels according to the amplifier’s common mode rejection capability, leaving primarily the incoherent noise. This is listed as the balanced current noise in data sheets. If the resistance seen at the two inputs is greatly mismatched, then the coherent and incoherent noise components remain and the voltage noise adds as the root sum of squares. This is listed in some data sheets as unbalanced noise current.

Both the LT1028 and LT6018 have lower voltage noise than a 100Ω resistor (which at room temperature is 1.3nV/√Hz), so where source resistances are higher, the op amp’s voltage noise will often not be the limiting factor for noise in the circuit. In cases where the source resistances are much lower, the amplifier’s voltage noise will begin to dominate. For very high source resistances, the amplifier’s current noise dominates, and in the middle the Johnson noise of the resistors dominates (for well designed op amps which do not have excessively high noise power). The resistance at which the amplifier current noise and voltage noise are balanced so that neither dominates is equal to the amplifier’s voltage noise divided by its current noise. Since voltage and current noise vary with frequency so too does this midpoint resistance. For an unbalanced source, at 10Hz the midpoint of LT6018 is approximately 86Ω; at 10kHz it is about 320Ω.

Minimizing Circuit Noise

So what is the design engineer to do to minimize noise? For processing voltage signals, reducing the equivalent resistance below the amplifier’s midpoint resistance is a good place to start. For many applications the source resistance is fixed by the preceding stage, often a sensor. The gain and feedback resistors can be chosen to be small. However since the feedback resistor forms part of the op amp load, there are limits due to the amplifier’s output drive capability and the acceptable amount of heat and power dissipation. In addition to the resistance seen by the inputs, the frequency should also be considered. The total noise consists of the noise density integrated over the entire frequency. Filtering noise at frequencies higher (and perhaps also lower) than the signal bandwidth is important.

In transimpedance applications, where the input to the amplifier is a current, a different strategy is needed. In this case, the Johnson noise of the feedback resistor increases as a square root factor of its resistance value, but at the same time the signal gain increase is linear with the resistance value. Hence the best SNR is achieved with as large a resistance as the voltage capability or the current noise of the op amp allows. For an interesting example, see the back page application on page 26 of the LTC6090 data sheet.

Noise and Other Headaches

Noise is just one source of error, and should be considered within the context of other error sources. Input offset voltage (the voltage mismatch at the op amp inputs) can be thought of as DC noise. Its impact can be reduced significantly by doing a one-time system calibration, but this offset voltage changes with temperature and time as a result of changes in mechanical stress. It also changes with input level (CMRR) and power supply (PSRR). Real-time system calibration to cancel drift caused by these variables quickly becomes expensive and impractical. For harsh environment applications where the temperature fluctuates considerably, measurement uncertainty due to offset voltage and drift can dominate over noise. For example, an op amp with 5μV/°C temperature drift can experience an input-referred shift of 625μV from -40°C to 85°C due to temperature drift alone.

Compared with this, a few hundred nanovolts of noise is inconsequential. The LT6018 has outstanding drift performance of 0.5μV/°C and a maximum offset spec of 80μV from -40°C to 85°C. For even better performance, the recently released LTC2057 auto-zero amplifier has a maximum offset voltage of less than 7μV from -40°C to 125°C. Its wideband noise of 11nV/√Hz, and its DC to 10Hz noise is 200nVP-P. While this is higher noise than the LT6018, the LTC2057 can sometimes be the better choice for low frequency applications due to its outstanding input offset drift over temperature. It is also worth noting that due to its low input bias current, the LT2057 has much lower current noise than the LT6018. Another benefit of the LTC2057 low input bias current is that it has very low clock feedthrough compared with many other zero-drift amplifiers. Some of these other zero-drift amplifiers can exhibit large voltage noise spurs when source impedance is high.

In such high precision circuits, care must also be taken to minimize thermocouple effects, which occur anywhere that there is a junction of dissimilar metals. Even junctions of two copper wires from different manufacturers can generate thermal EMFs of 200nV/°C, over 13 times the worst-case drift of the LTC2057. Layout techniques to match or minimize the number of junctions in the amplifier’s input signal path, keep inputs and matching junctions close together, and avoiding thermal gradients are important in these low drift circuits.

Conclusion

Noise is a fundamental physical limitation. To minimize its effects in processing sensor signals, care must be taken in choosing a suitable op amp, in minimizing and matching input resistances, and in the physical layout of the design.

-----

Author: By Brian Black, Product Marketing Manager, Signal Conditioning Products and Glen Brisebois, Senior Applications Engineer, Signal Conditioning Products, © Linear Technology

Elmos: EBIT margin well above consensus in Q2
According to preliminary figures, Elmos Semiconductor AG (FSE: ELG) anticipates sales growth of...

New rugged modular 1.27mm pitch connector series from Nicomatic...
Nicomatic, the leading manufacturer of high-performance interconnect...

RFMW to distribute Knowles Precision Devices
RFMW Ltd. signed a distribution agreement with Knowles Precision Devices effective, 1st...

Changelight orders additional Aixtron systems
The Chinese company Xiamen Changelight is expanding its production capacities for...

Xilinx acquires Chinese start-up DeePhi Tech
Xilinx has acquired DeePhi Technology Co., Ltd (DeePhi Tech), a Beijing-based privately...

Scalable digital controllers for cloud computing, communications and...
Renesas Electronics Corporation, a premier supplier of advanced semiconductor solutions, today...

HMS Networks AB acquires German company Beck IPC
Swedish HMS Industrial Networks AB, a wholly owned subsidiary of HMS Networks AB...

Reduce driver distraction with automotive-qualified 3D gesture recognition...
Car manufacturers are increasingly seeking ways to reduce driver distraction through...

Micron and Intel to complete joint development
Micron and Intel have agreed to complete joint development for the second generation of 3D...

Nexans gets new CEO
Christopher Guérin has been with Nexans since 1997 and most recently since 2014...

Airbus Helicopters and the Ukraine sign for 55 helicopters
Following the Intergovernmental Agreement signed between France and Ukraine on 8 June, Airbus Helicopters has signed a contract with the Ukrainian Ministry of Interior.

BAG electronics becomes a part of Osram
BAG electronics, specialising in electronic control gear, LED modules and software for...

Planar-Type Hall-effect sensors suitable for Mobile, IoT and...
MagnaChip Semiconductor Corporation (“MagnaChip”)...

In-depth investigation into Siemens / Alstom Deal
The European Commission has opened an in-depth investigation to assess the proposed...

Dialog ups profitability in Q2/2018
Dialog Semiconductor Plc expects higher than anticipated profitability in Q2/2018.

Infineon hits 5bn production milestone of its bulk-CMOS radio...
Highest quality standards and industry-leading semiconductor components through innovation...

Nanotron and DecaWave cooperate on micro-location...
Nanotron Technologies GmbH and DecaWave have signed an IP License and Co-operation...

Bittium invests in evismo AG
Bittium expands its medical remote diagnostics service offering to Switzerland by...

Intel acquire eASIC
Intel, one of the world’s biggest chip manufacturer, has acquired eASIC, a designer of...

Veeco sells multiple AP300 lithography systems
Veeco Instruments has received an order for multiple AP300 lithography systems to support...

New CFOs for Carl Zeiss and Carl Zeiss Meditec
Effective 1 October 2018, Dr. Christian Müller will become CFO of Carl Zeiss AG. He will succeed...

Radiation-tolerant secure authenticator designed to withstand harsh...
Medical device designers can protect surgical tool data from memory-disruptive, high-energy...

Most Read

Load more news
## Comments