© dmitry naumov dreamstime.com
Application Notes | November 01, 2013
This means that when the transistor is on and conducting current, the voltage drop across its power path is minimal. When the transistor is off and blocking high voltage, there is almost no current through its power path. So the semiconductor transistor is like an ideal switch.

The power loss in the transistor is therefore minimized. High efficiency, low power dissipation and high power density (small size) are the main reasons for designers to use SMPS instead of linear regulators or LDOs, especially in high current applications. For example, nowadays a 12VIN, 3.3VOUT switching mode synchronous buck step-down supply can usually achieve >90% efficiency vs. less than 27.5% from a linear regulator. This means a power loss or size reduction of at least eight times.

The Most Popular Switching Supply—the Buck Converter

Figure 8 shows the simplest and most popular switching regulator, the buck DC/DC converter. It has two operating modes, depending on if the transistor Q1 is turned on or off. To simplify the discussion, all the power devices are assumed to be ideal. When switch (transistor) Q1 is turned on, the switching node voltage VSW = VIN and inductor L current is being charged up by (VIN – VO). Figure 8(a) shows the equivalent circuit in this inductor-charging mode. When switch Q1 is turned off, inductor current goes through the freewheeling diode D1, as shown in Figure 8(b). The switching node voltage VSW = 0V and inductor L current is discharged by the VO load. Since the ideal inductor cannot have DC voltage in the steady state, the average output voltage VO can be given as:

Where TON is the on-time interval within the switching period TS. If the ratio of TON/TS is defined as duty cycle D, the output voltage VO is:

When the filter inductor L and output capacitor CO values are sufficiently high, the output voltage VO is a DC voltage with only mV ripple. In this case, for a 12V input buck supply, conceptually, a 27.5% duty cycle provides a 3.3V output voltage.

Equation (5) is the same as equation (3). The same volt-second balance approach can be used for other DC/DC topologies to derive the duty cycle vs. VIN and VO equations.

Power Losses in a Buck Converter

- DC Conduction Losses

With ideal components (zero voltage drop in the ON state and zero switching loss), an ideal buck converter is 100% efficient. In reality, power dissipation is always associated with every power component. There are two types of losses in an SMPS: DC conduction losses and AC switching losses.

The conduction losses of a buck converter primarily result from voltage drops across transistor Q1, diode D1 and inductor L when they conduct current. To simplify the discussion, the AC ripple of inductor current is neglected in the following conduction loss calculation. If a MOSFET is used as the power transistor, the conduction loss of the MOSFET equals IO2 • RDS(ON) • D, where RDS(ON) is the on-resistance of MOSFET Q1. The conduction power loss of the diode equals IO • VD • (1 – D), where VD is the forward voltage drop of the diode D1. The conduction loss of the inductor equals IO2 • RDCR, where RDCR is the copper resistance of the inductor winding. Therefore, the conduction loss of the buck converter is approximately:

For example, a 12V input, 3.3V/10AMAX output buck supply can use following components: MOSFET RDS(ON) = 10mΩ, inductor RDCR = 2mΩ, diode forward voltage VD = 0.5V. Therefore, the conduction loss at full load is:

Considering only conduction loss, the converter efficiency is:

The above analysis shows that the freewheeling diode consumes 3.62W power loss, which is much higher than the conduction losses of the MOSFET Q1 and the inductor L. To further improve efficiency, diode D1 can be replaced with a MOSFET Q2, as shown in Figure 9. This converter is referred to as a synchronous buck converter. Q2’s gate requires signals complementary to the Q1 gate, i.e., Q2 is only on when Q1 is off. The conduction loss of the synchronous buck converter is:

If a 10mΩ RDS(ON) MOSFET is used for Q2 as well, the conduction loss and efficiency of the synchronous buck converter are:

The above example shows that the synchronous buck is more efficient than a conventional buck converter, especially for low output voltage applications where the duty cycle is small and the conduction time of the diode D1 is long.

Figure 9. Synchronous Buck Converter and Its Transistor Gate Signals

- AC Switching Losses

In addition to the DC conduction losses, there are other AC/switching related power losses due to the non-ideal power components:

1. MOSFET switching losses. A real transistor requires time to be turned on or off. So there are voltage and current overlaps during the turn-on and turn-off transients, which generate AC switching losses. Figure 10 shows the typical switching waveforms of the MOSFET Q1 in the synchronous buck converter. The charging and discharging of the top FET Q1’s parasitic capacitor CGD with charge QGD determine most of the Q1 switching time and related losses.

In the synchronous buck, the bottom FET Q2 switching loss is small, because Q2 is always turned on after its body diode conducts and is turned off before its body diode conducts, while the voltage drop across the body diode is low. However, the body diode reverse recovery charge of Q2 can also increase the switching loss of the top FET Q1 and can generate switching voltage ringing and EMI noise. Equation (12) shows that the control FET Q1 switching loss is proportional to the converter switching frequency fS. The accurate calculation of the energy losses EON and EOFF for Q1 is not simple but can be found from MOSFET vendors’ application notes.

Figure 10. Typical Switching Waveform and Losses in the Top FET Q1 in the Buck Converter

2. Inductor core loss PSW_CORE. A real inductor also has AC loss that is a function of switching frequency. Inductor AC loss is primarily from the magnetic core loss. In a high frequency SMPS, the core material may be powdered iron or ferrite. In general, powdered iron cores saturate softly but have high core loss, while ferrite material saturates more sharply but has less core loss. Ferrites are ceramic ferromagnetic materials that have a crystalline structure consisting of mixtures of iron oxide with either manganese or zinc oxide. Core losses are due mainly to magnetic hysteresis loss. The core or inductor manufacturer usually provides the core loss data for power supply designers to estimate the AC inductor loss.

3. Other AC related losses. Other AC related losses include the gate driver loss PSW_GATE, which equals VDRV • QG • fS, and the dead time (when both top FET Q1 and bottom FET Q2 are off) body diode conduction loss, which is equal to (ΔTON + ΔTOFF) • VD(Q2) • fS.

In summary, the switching-related loss includes:

The calculation of switching related losses is usually not easy. The switching related losses are proportional to switching frequency fS. In the 12VIN, 3.3VO/10AMAX synchronous buck converter, the AC loss causes about 2% to 5% efficiency loss with 200kHz – 500kHz switching frequency. So the overall efficiency is about 93% at full load, much better than that of an LR or LDO supply. The heat or size reduction can be close to 10x.

## Part 2: Switching Mode power supply basics

Why Use a Switching Mode Supply? A quick answer is high efficiency. In an SMPS, the transistors are operated in switching mode instead of linear mode.

##### Index Head

Application Note: P281

The power loss in the transistor is therefore minimized. High efficiency, low power dissipation and high power density (small size) are the main reasons for designers to use SMPS instead of linear regulators or LDOs, especially in high current applications. For example, nowadays a 12VIN, 3.3VOUT switching mode synchronous buck step-down supply can usually achieve >90% efficiency vs. less than 27.5% from a linear regulator. This means a power loss or size reduction of at least eight times.

The Most Popular Switching Supply—the Buck Converter

Figure 8 shows the simplest and most popular switching regulator, the buck DC/DC converter. It has two operating modes, depending on if the transistor Q1 is turned on or off. To simplify the discussion, all the power devices are assumed to be ideal. When switch (transistor) Q1 is turned on, the switching node voltage VSW = VIN and inductor L current is being charged up by (VIN – VO). Figure 8(a) shows the equivalent circuit in this inductor-charging mode. When switch Q1 is turned off, inductor current goes through the freewheeling diode D1, as shown in Figure 8(b). The switching node voltage VSW = 0V and inductor L current is discharged by the VO load. Since the ideal inductor cannot have DC voltage in the steady state, the average output voltage VO can be given as:

Where TON is the on-time interval within the switching period TS. If the ratio of TON/TS is defined as duty cycle D, the output voltage VO is:

When the filter inductor L and output capacitor CO values are sufficiently high, the output voltage VO is a DC voltage with only mV ripple. In this case, for a 12V input buck supply, conceptually, a 27.5% duty cycle provides a 3.3V output voltage.

Other than the above averaging approach, there is another way to derive the duty cycle equation. The ideal inductor cannot have DC voltage in steady state. So it must maintain inductor volt-second balance within a switching period. According to the inductor voltage waveform in Figure 8, volt-second balance requires:

Zoom image: Figure 8. Buck Converter Operating Modes and Typical Waveforms / © Linear Technology

Equation (5) is the same as equation (3). The same volt-second balance approach can be used for other DC/DC topologies to derive the duty cycle vs. VIN and VO equations.

Power Losses in a Buck Converter

- DC Conduction Losses

With ideal components (zero voltage drop in the ON state and zero switching loss), an ideal buck converter is 100% efficient. In reality, power dissipation is always associated with every power component. There are two types of losses in an SMPS: DC conduction losses and AC switching losses.

The conduction losses of a buck converter primarily result from voltage drops across transistor Q1, diode D1 and inductor L when they conduct current. To simplify the discussion, the AC ripple of inductor current is neglected in the following conduction loss calculation. If a MOSFET is used as the power transistor, the conduction loss of the MOSFET equals IO2 • RDS(ON) • D, where RDS(ON) is the on-resistance of MOSFET Q1. The conduction power loss of the diode equals IO • VD • (1 – D), where VD is the forward voltage drop of the diode D1. The conduction loss of the inductor equals IO2 • RDCR, where RDCR is the copper resistance of the inductor winding. Therefore, the conduction loss of the buck converter is approximately:

For example, a 12V input, 3.3V/10AMAX output buck supply can use following components: MOSFET RDS(ON) = 10mΩ, inductor RDCR = 2mΩ, diode forward voltage VD = 0.5V. Therefore, the conduction loss at full load is:

Considering only conduction loss, the converter efficiency is:

The above analysis shows that the freewheeling diode consumes 3.62W power loss, which is much higher than the conduction losses of the MOSFET Q1 and the inductor L. To further improve efficiency, diode D1 can be replaced with a MOSFET Q2, as shown in Figure 9. This converter is referred to as a synchronous buck converter. Q2’s gate requires signals complementary to the Q1 gate, i.e., Q2 is only on when Q1 is off. The conduction loss of the synchronous buck converter is:

If a 10mΩ RDS(ON) MOSFET is used for Q2 as well, the conduction loss and efficiency of the synchronous buck converter are:

The above example shows that the synchronous buck is more efficient than a conventional buck converter, especially for low output voltage applications where the duty cycle is small and the conduction time of the diode D1 is long.

Figure 9. Synchronous Buck Converter and Its Transistor Gate Signals

- AC Switching Losses

In addition to the DC conduction losses, there are other AC/switching related power losses due to the non-ideal power components:

1. MOSFET switching losses. A real transistor requires time to be turned on or off. So there are voltage and current overlaps during the turn-on and turn-off transients, which generate AC switching losses. Figure 10 shows the typical switching waveforms of the MOSFET Q1 in the synchronous buck converter. The charging and discharging of the top FET Q1’s parasitic capacitor CGD with charge QGD determine most of the Q1 switching time and related losses.

In the synchronous buck, the bottom FET Q2 switching loss is small, because Q2 is always turned on after its body diode conducts and is turned off before its body diode conducts, while the voltage drop across the body diode is low. However, the body diode reverse recovery charge of Q2 can also increase the switching loss of the top FET Q1 and can generate switching voltage ringing and EMI noise. Equation (12) shows that the control FET Q1 switching loss is proportional to the converter switching frequency fS. The accurate calculation of the energy losses EON and EOFF for Q1 is not simple but can be found from MOSFET vendors’ application notes.

Figure 10. Typical Switching Waveform and Losses in the Top FET Q1 in the Buck Converter

2. Inductor core loss PSW_CORE. A real inductor also has AC loss that is a function of switching frequency. Inductor AC loss is primarily from the magnetic core loss. In a high frequency SMPS, the core material may be powdered iron or ferrite. In general, powdered iron cores saturate softly but have high core loss, while ferrite material saturates more sharply but has less core loss. Ferrites are ceramic ferromagnetic materials that have a crystalline structure consisting of mixtures of iron oxide with either manganese or zinc oxide. Core losses are due mainly to magnetic hysteresis loss. The core or inductor manufacturer usually provides the core loss data for power supply designers to estimate the AC inductor loss.

3. Other AC related losses. Other AC related losses include the gate driver loss PSW_GATE, which equals VDRV • QG • fS, and the dead time (when both top FET Q1 and bottom FET Q2 are off) body diode conduction loss, which is equal to (ΔTON + ΔTOFF) • VD(Q2) • fS.

In summary, the switching-related loss includes:

##### Index Head

Application Note: P281

3M to sell its Communication Markets Division
3M says that it has entered into agreements related to the sale of substantially all of its...

Gigajot licenses binary pixel technology from Rambus
Dartmouth College-based startup Gigajot Technology has licensed Rambus Binary Pixel...

Dialog & Richtek partner for Chinese smartphone and tablet market
Dialog Semiconductor is partnering with Richtek Technology Corporation, a...

Globalfoundries teams up with Ayar Labs
Globalfoundries and Ayar Labs, a startup bringing optical input/output (I/O) to silicon...

Synapse Design acquires ACEIC
Synapse Design Inc., a design services partner serving system and semiconductor companies...

Authorised distributors see continued growth in 2018
The afdec forecast revealed that the market is likely to have grown by 17 percent in 2017...

Miele increases stake in Korean partner Yujin Robot
The German domestic appliance company Miele is set to intensify its strategic cooperation with...

Phoenix Solar to file for bankruptcy
Phoenix Solar is facing USD 8 million in reimbursement claims after a US customer has drawn...

Sponsored content by Premier Farnell

Drive innovation smarter with Farnell sensors range
An electronic sensor detects and measures a physical phenomenon, such as temperature, pressure, force, or acceleration, and provides a corresponding output signal, usually in the form of an electrical, mechanical, magnetic...
Design considerations for military systems & how to mitigate component...
Military equipment is expected to have a service life of decades so designing new systems...

Better data security for vehicle communication with AURIX & CycurHSM
The more connectivity and automated driving functions are built into cars, the more...

GE Power to cut 12'000 jobs
GE Power plans to reduce its global headcount by approximately 12,000 positions...

Thales acquires Aveillant
French defence and security company Thales has acquired Aveillant Ltd, a Cambridge (UK)...

Sponsored content by Mouser Eelectronics

Bourns MF-USML Series PPTC Resettable Fuses
The resettable Fuses offer maximum operating current from 1.75A to 7.0A and resistance values starting at 13.5mΩ. Typical applications for these products include port protection, wearable devices, and battery protection.
Veeco's MOCVD system shipped to China for LED production
Veeco Instruments has received an order for multiple TurboDisc EPIK 868 Gallium Nitride (GaN)...

Smiths growing in China with new Interconnect facility
Smiths Group Chief Executive Andy Reynolds Smith opened a new Interconnect site in Suzhou...

A short history of hybrid & module technology
Why it continues as a packaging technology of choice for high reliability applications.

Nidec acquires driveXpert GmbH
Nidec Motors & Actuators (Germany) GmbH has acquired driveXpert GmbH, specialised in...

Significant progress towards achieving large-capacity Flash...
Renesas Electronics achieves large-scale memory operation in fin-shaped MONOS Flash...

PARC to partner with Blue Origin to accelerate space R&D
PARC, a Xerox company, has entered into a partnership with Blue Origin to enhance...

RFMW’s 5GHz WiFi FEM rejects 2.4GHz
RFMW, Ltd. announces design and sales support for the Qorvo QPF4518, 5.150 to 5.925GHz...

Dialog Semi acquires LED backlight technology from ams AG
Dialog Semiconductor has purchased ams AG’s LED backlight technology and...

Most Read

Load more news
## Comments